<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 857 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788102</link>
    <description>A mere show cause notice issued in contempt proceedings is not an appealable adjudication because it does not determine any right or contention; the alleged contemner must first respond before the Tribunal. Directions requiring production of documents and cooperation with a forensic auditor are sustainable when they fall within the Tribunal&#039;s statutory power to order discovery and production under the Companies Act, 2013, and when they are confined to relevant transactions. Where such a direction has already been superseded by a later order, there is no basis to keep the appeal pending or to interfere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 857 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788102</link>
      <description>A mere show cause notice issued in contempt proceedings is not an appealable adjudication because it does not determine any right or contention; the alleged contemner must first respond before the Tribunal. Directions requiring production of documents and cooperation with a forensic auditor are sustainable when they fall within the Tribunal&#039;s statutory power to order discovery and production under the Companies Act, 2013, and when they are confined to relevant transactions. Where such a direction has already been superseded by a later order, there is no basis to keep the appeal pending or to interfere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>