<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 864 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788109</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under section 148 uploaded on the assessee&#039;s portal was unsigned, while the Revenue relied on a signed copy from the assessment record. Both carried the same DIN, but the discrepancy between the served notice and the record copy was not explained. Because the notice was the foundational jurisdictional document for reassessment, its validity was necessary to sustain the proceedings. The unsigned notice served on the assessee was treated as invalid, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 864 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788109</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under section 148 uploaded on the assessee&#039;s portal was unsigned, while the Revenue relied on a signed copy from the assessment record. Both carried the same DIN, but the discrepancy between the served notice and the record copy was not explained. Because the notice was the foundational jurisdictional document for reassessment, its validity was necessary to sustain the proceedings. The unsigned notice served on the assessee was treated as invalid, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>