<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 876 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788121</link>
    <description>The note addresses two tax issues: (i) the correctness of deleting a disallowance for expenditure relating to exempt income where dividend was treated as taxable and a coordinate-bench precedent on computing disallowance under the rule was applied; the appellate deletion of the disallowance is sustained. (ii) the correctness of deleting a disallowance under the actual-payment requirement for interest payable to a cooperative bank; where the bank appears in the RBI Second Schedule it qualifies as a scheduled bank and interest remains subject to the actual-payment rule, and capitalization of interest to work-in-progress only defers deduction and does not satisfy the payment requirement; the disallowance is restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 876 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788121</link>
      <description>The note addresses two tax issues: (i) the correctness of deleting a disallowance for expenditure relating to exempt income where dividend was treated as taxable and a coordinate-bench precedent on computing disallowance under the rule was applied; the appellate deletion of the disallowance is sustained. (ii) the correctness of deleting a disallowance under the actual-payment requirement for interest payable to a cooperative bank; where the bank appears in the RBI Second Schedule it qualifies as a scheduled bank and interest remains subject to the actual-payment rule, and capitalization of interest to work-in-progress only defers deduction and does not satisfy the payment requirement; the disallowance is restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>