<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Self-generated trademark transfer treated as capital receipt, not business income; short-term capital loss allowed accordingly.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97788</link>
    <description>Transfer of 22 self-generated registered trademarks was held to be a transfer of intangible assets distinct from goodwill, so proceeds did not attract capital gains computation under sections 48 and 55 because no ascertainable cost of acquisition existed; the 2001 amendment to the definition of cost of acquisition for trademarks was held prospective from 01.04.2002 and inapplicable. Revenue&#039;s attempts to characterise the receipt as business income or recoupment were rejected on the facts, and adoption of a DCF valuation did not alter legal character. The claimed short-term capital loss was allowed in view of applicable precedent; the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions were upheld and appeals dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Self-generated trademark transfer treated as capital receipt, not business income; short-term capital loss allowed accordingly.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97788</link>
      <description>Transfer of 22 self-generated registered trademarks was held to be a transfer of intangible assets distinct from goodwill, so proceeds did not attract capital gains computation under sections 48 and 55 because no ascertainable cost of acquisition existed; the 2001 amendment to the definition of cost of acquisition for trademarks was held prospective from 01.04.2002 and inapplicable. Revenue&#039;s attempts to characterise the receipt as business income or recoupment were rejected on the facts, and adoption of a DCF valuation did not alter legal character. The claimed short-term capital loss was allowed in view of applicable precedent; the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions were upheld and appeals dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>