<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Disallowance under tax law for investment expenses cannot be applied mechanically; authority must record clear reasons before increasing assessee&#039;s suo motu deduction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97786</link>
    <description>Suo motu disallowance claimed in the return relating to investment-related expenses cannot be rejected mechanically; the tax authority must record clear findings explaining why the assessee&#039;s suo motu disallowance and the supporting accountant&#039;s report are unacceptable and must demonstrate bona fide satisfaction and objective reasons before invoking the disallowance rule beyond the assessee&#039;s amount. Prior precedent on identical questions precluded reopening those issues, and the appellate tribunal&#039;s restriction on additional disallowance was upheld. The appeal was dismissed to the extent the earlier rulings governed the same questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Disallowance under tax law for investment expenses cannot be applied mechanically; authority must record clear reasons before increasing assessee&#039;s suo motu deduction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97786</link>
      <description>Suo motu disallowance claimed in the return relating to investment-related expenses cannot be rejected mechanically; the tax authority must record clear findings explaining why the assessee&#039;s suo motu disallowance and the supporting accountant&#039;s report are unacceptable and must demonstrate bona fide satisfaction and objective reasons before invoking the disallowance rule beyond the assessee&#039;s amount. Prior precedent on identical questions precluded reopening those issues, and the appellate tribunal&#039;s restriction on additional disallowance was upheld. The appeal was dismissed to the extent the earlier rulings governed the same questions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>