<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Electronic service of process upheld and reasons to believe under PMLA sustained; Adjudicating Authority to determine supply of relied documents</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97763</link>
    <description>Electronic transmission of summons and relied-upon documents satisfied Rule 13(3)(iii) read with Rule 13(11) and Section 13 of the IT Act, and email delivery of PDF RUDs was held valid; recording of reasons to believe under Section 8(1) PMLA was examined and upheld as based on perusal of RUDs and investigation material; the Adjudicating Authority must determine whether specific documents qualify as relied upon documents and, if so, order their supply and permit a two week supplementary reply, with aggrieved parties able to seek remedies under Section 26 PMLA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Electronic service of process upheld and reasons to believe under PMLA sustained; Adjudicating Authority to determine supply of relied documents</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97763</link>
      <description>Electronic transmission of summons and relied-upon documents satisfied Rule 13(3)(iii) read with Rule 13(11) and Section 13 of the IT Act, and email delivery of PDF RUDs was held valid; recording of reasons to believe under Section 8(1) PMLA was examined and upheld as based on perusal of RUDs and investigation material; the Adjudicating Authority must determine whether specific documents qualify as relied upon documents and, if so, order their supply and permit a two week supplementary reply, with aggrieved parties able to seek remedies under Section 26 PMLA.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>