https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467361 When a litigant, acting on bona fide legal advice, prosecutes the matter before an incorrect forum, the period spent in those proceedings is excluded when assessing delay for condonation under the Limitation framework; the appellate court erred in denying condonation without hearing on maintainability. Applying that principle, the time consumed by a review petition pursued bona fide was excluded, no unexplained delay remained, and condonation was granted. The appeal was allowed in principle and the matter remanded to the first appellate court for adjudication on merits. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467361 When a litigant, acting on bona fide legal advice, prosecutes the matter before an incorrect forum, the period spent in those proceedings is excluded when assessing delay for condonation under the Limitation framework; the appellate court erred in denying condonation without hearing on maintainability. Applying that principle, the time consumed by a review petition pursued bona fide was excluded, no unexplained delay remained, and condonation was granted. The appeal was allowed in principle and the matter remanded to the first appellate court for adjudication on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467361