<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1651 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467363</link>
    <description>Extrapolation of sporadic seized notings to an assessee&#039;s entire turnover is impermissible without independent corroboration; estimations must rest on a rational evidentiary basis. In the present matter the seized records supported additions only to the amounts specifically recorded therein and to the profit element derived from those unaccounted sales, whereas the assessing officer&#039;s application of an average unaccounted-sales ratio to total book turnover produced an implausible, unsupported net-profit result. Operatively, additions were confined to the confirmed profit element from seized unaccounted sales and the broader extrapolation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1651 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467363</link>
      <description>Extrapolation of sporadic seized notings to an assessee&#039;s entire turnover is impermissible without independent corroboration; estimations must rest on a rational evidentiary basis. In the present matter the seized records supported additions only to the amounts specifically recorded therein and to the profit element derived from those unaccounted sales, whereas the assessing officer&#039;s application of an average unaccounted-sales ratio to total book turnover produced an implausible, unsupported net-profit result. Operatively, additions were confined to the confirmed profit element from seized unaccounted sales and the broader extrapolation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>