https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467368 Delay in filing a first appeal may be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act where sufficient cause is shown, and medical incapacity supported by prescription slips and treatment records can justify a liberal, justice-oriented approach. On the facts recorded, the 170-day delay was accepted because the appellant was undergoing treatment and could not consult counsel within limitation. Revisional interference under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not warranted when the appellate court has exercised discretion judicially on the basis of the material before it and no jurisdictional error, illegality, or material irregularity is shown. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:04:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467368 Delay in filing a first appeal may be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act where sufficient cause is shown, and medical incapacity supported by prescription slips and treatment records can justify a liberal, justice-oriented approach. On the facts recorded, the 170-day delay was accepted because the appellant was undergoing treatment and could not consult counsel within limitation. Revisional interference under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not warranted when the appellate court has exercised discretion judicially on the basis of the material before it and no jurisdictional error, illegality, or material irregularity is shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467368