https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467387 Petitions challenging multiple circulars raising substantially similar legal questions were disposed without substantive adjudication because identical issues are pending before the Supreme Court; the court reasoned that parallel determination would risk inconsistent outcomes and duplicate judicial resources, and directed that the authoritative determination emerging from the higher forum shall govern the petitioners' cases. The operative effect is abstention from further adjudication here and reliance on the Supreme Court's forthcoming ruling to resolve the contested legal questions. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:04:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467387 Petitions challenging multiple circulars raising substantially similar legal questions were disposed without substantive adjudication because identical issues are pending before the Supreme Court; the court reasoned that parallel determination would risk inconsistent outcomes and duplicate judicial resources, and directed that the authoritative determination emerging from the higher forum shall govern the petitioners' cases. The operative effect is abstention from further adjudication here and reliance on the Supreme Court's forthcoming ruling to resolve the contested legal questions. Case-Laws GST Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467387