<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 98 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the department&#039;s failure to provide sufficient evidence to support the price revision of imported Zeolite. The decision highlighted the significance of contemporaneous import evidence and the necessity to consider variations in prices based on different suppliers and origins.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 98 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the department&#039;s failure to provide sufficient evidence to support the price revision of imported Zeolite. The decision highlighted the significance of contemporaneous import evidence and the necessity to consider variations in prices based on different suppliers and origins.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>