<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 735 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787980</link>
    <description>Delay in filing and refiling was condoned, but the challenge to the computation method of the settlement amount did not proceed further because counsel stated that an identical order had already been challenged in another matter and that SLP had been dismissed. On that basis, the Court dismissed the present special leave petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 735 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787980</link>
      <description>Delay in filing and refiling was condoned, but the challenge to the computation method of the settlement amount did not proceed further because counsel stated that an identical order had already been challenged in another matter and that SLP had been dismissed. On that basis, the Court dismissed the present special leave petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>