<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 738 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787983</link>
    <description>Deeming presumption in capacity/duty rules yields to clear contemporaneous documentary and testimonial evidence proving later commencement; duty was confined to actual operation from 16.05.2011 to 18.05.2011. Penalties predicated on alleged clandestine manufacture and document fabrication cannot be sustained absent independent corroboration and where incriminatory statements relied on were not subjected to cross examination; penalties set aside. Death of an appellant, proved by official certificate, requires abatement where no substitution or continuation is shown; that appeal is abated. Overall effect: duty limited to proven operation period, other demands and penalties rescinded, and one appeal abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 13:10:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 738 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787983</link>
      <description>Deeming presumption in capacity/duty rules yields to clear contemporaneous documentary and testimonial evidence proving later commencement; duty was confined to actual operation from 16.05.2011 to 18.05.2011. Penalties predicated on alleged clandestine manufacture and document fabrication cannot be sustained absent independent corroboration and where incriminatory statements relied on were not subjected to cross examination; penalties set aside. Death of an appellant, proved by official certificate, requires abatement where no substitution or continuation is shown; that appeal is abated. Overall effect: duty limited to proven operation period, other demands and penalties rescinded, and one appeal abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>