<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 747 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787992</link>
    <description>Where receipts recorded as tolls/green tax and traffic penalties were substantiated by documentary reconciliation (ledgers, Form 26AS, balance sheet) and treated as reimbursements paid as a pure agent, those amounts were excluded from the taxable value of services; consequently the residual taxable value fell below the exemption threshold under Notification No.33/2012-ST and related non-levy circulars, relieving the provider of service tax liability on those amounts. The reverse-charge notifications and exemption circulars were applied; computing liability by mechanical percentage comparisons was disapproved. Demands, interest and penalties premised on such reimbursed amounts were held unsustainable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 747 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787992</link>
      <description>Where receipts recorded as tolls/green tax and traffic penalties were substantiated by documentary reconciliation (ledgers, Form 26AS, balance sheet) and treated as reimbursements paid as a pure agent, those amounts were excluded from the taxable value of services; consequently the residual taxable value fell below the exemption threshold under Notification No.33/2012-ST and related non-levy circulars, relieving the provider of service tax liability on those amounts. The reverse-charge notifications and exemption circulars were applied; computing liability by mechanical percentage comparisons was disapproved. Demands, interest and penalties premised on such reimbursed amounts were held unsustainable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>