<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 748 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787993</link>
    <description>The note addresses classification of intra mine movement of overburden/rejects/screened material: where transport is remunerated per trip or per tonne, evidenced by trip challans and weighbridge records, it is a post mining activity classifiable as Goods Transport by Road Service rather than Mining Service, and qualifies for Notification No. 34/2004 ST exemption when per consignment charges fall within the exemption threshold. It also treats limitation: where the department previously accepted the transport classification in earlier audits, invoking the extended period of limitation to reopen the same issue is impermissible; consequent demands under Mining Service and extended limitation were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 748 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787993</link>
      <description>The note addresses classification of intra mine movement of overburden/rejects/screened material: where transport is remunerated per trip or per tonne, evidenced by trip challans and weighbridge records, it is a post mining activity classifiable as Goods Transport by Road Service rather than Mining Service, and qualifies for Notification No. 34/2004 ST exemption when per consignment charges fall within the exemption threshold. It also treats limitation: where the department previously accepted the transport classification in earlier audits, invoking the extended period of limitation to reopen the same issue is impermissible; consequent demands under Mining Service and extended limitation were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>