<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 754 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787999</link>
    <description>The issue concerns whether a discharge certificate issued under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS-4) precludes reopening of proceedings for the same period and matter. The article explains that where an application under SVLDRS was processed, amounts determined and paid, and a discharge certificate issued, that certificate operates to conclude the declared matter and period; summary re opening without addressing eligibility, processing and the certificate undermines the scheme&#039;s object, finality and principles of natural justice. The impugned original and appellate orders confirming demands and penalties were thus quashed and the writ petition succeeded in favour of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 754 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787999</link>
      <description>The issue concerns whether a discharge certificate issued under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS-4) precludes reopening of proceedings for the same period and matter. The article explains that where an application under SVLDRS was processed, amounts determined and paid, and a discharge certificate issued, that certificate operates to conclude the declared matter and period; summary re opening without addressing eligibility, processing and the certificate undermines the scheme&#039;s object, finality and principles of natural justice. The impugned original and appellate orders confirming demands and penalties were thus quashed and the writ petition succeeded in favour of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>