<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 756 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788001</link>
    <description>The moratorium under the Insolvency Code bars continuation of assessment proceedings by a statutory authority during CIRP and excludes claims founded on assessments completed during the moratorium; such claims were held inadmissible. Claims filed after committee of creditors&#039; approval of a resolution plan are barred because CIRP is time bound and reopening after plan approval undermines finality; belated claims were rejected. Adverse findings against the resolution professional for alleged non-disclosure of pending proceedings were expunged for lack of proof that the proceedings were notified to the IRP/RP or wilfully concealed by management; the appeals were allowed and the impugned admission set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 18:26:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 756 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788001</link>
      <description>The moratorium under the Insolvency Code bars continuation of assessment proceedings by a statutory authority during CIRP and excludes claims founded on assessments completed during the moratorium; such claims were held inadmissible. Claims filed after committee of creditors&#039; approval of a resolution plan are barred because CIRP is time bound and reopening after plan approval undermines finality; belated claims were rejected. Adverse findings against the resolution professional for alleged non-disclosure of pending proceedings were expunged for lack of proof that the proceedings were notified to the IRP/RP or wilfully concealed by management; the appeals were allowed and the impugned admission set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>