<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 757 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788002</link>
    <description>Regulation 13(1B) permits verification and categorisation only for claims received after the Regulation 12 period up to seven days before the CoC meeting, and Regulation 13(1C) requires intimation and placement of acceptable late claims and, if necessary, seeking condonation. Applying these rules and the proviso to Regulation 6A on public announcement as notice, the RP&#039;s refusal to admit a claim filed four days before the CoC meeting was consistent with the statutory cutoff and the policy of finality in the insolvency process; the earlier order rejecting the belated claim was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 757 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788002</link>
      <description>Regulation 13(1B) permits verification and categorisation only for claims received after the Regulation 12 period up to seven days before the CoC meeting, and Regulation 13(1C) requires intimation and placement of acceptable late claims and, if necessary, seeking condonation. Applying these rules and the proviso to Regulation 6A on public announcement as notice, the RP&#039;s refusal to admit a claim filed four days before the CoC meeting was consistent with the statutory cutoff and the policy of finality in the insolvency process; the earlier order rejecting the belated claim was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>