<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 764 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788009</link>
    <description>The note addresses entitlement to Notification No. 12/2012-Cus (Sl. No.318) relief for gold dore imports by assessing compliance with Condition No.5 and Conditions 34(b)-34(c): packing lists must match miners&#039; packing lists and assay certificates must be issued by the mining company or its laboratory. It clarifies that laboratory physical proximity is not required and that conformity of exporter-issued documents with miners&#039; records sustains eligibility. On limitation, it records that invocation of extended limitation requires material showing deliberate suppression or fraud; mere re-examination of previously produced documents does not justify extension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 764 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788009</link>
      <description>The note addresses entitlement to Notification No. 12/2012-Cus (Sl. No.318) relief for gold dore imports by assessing compliance with Condition No.5 and Conditions 34(b)-34(c): packing lists must match miners&#039; packing lists and assay certificates must be issued by the mining company or its laboratory. It clarifies that laboratory physical proximity is not required and that conformity of exporter-issued documents with miners&#039; records sustains eligibility. On limitation, it records that invocation of extended limitation requires material showing deliberate suppression or fraud; mere re-examination of previously produced documents does not justify extension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>