<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 170 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50592</link>
    <description>Turnover tax paid under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was treated as deductible from the assessable value for central excise valuation because statutory levies not forming part of the sale price are excluded under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions and departmental instructions recognising that such turnover tax is not includible in assessable value. Deduction was therefore allowable, and the denial of deduction was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:26:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 170 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50592</link>
      <description>Turnover tax paid under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was treated as deductible from the assessable value for central excise valuation because statutory levies not forming part of the sale price are excluded under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions and departmental instructions recognising that such turnover tax is not includible in assessable value. Deduction was therefore allowable, and the denial of deduction was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>