<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 822 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788067</link>
    <description>Section 43B deduction for contributions to an approved pension fund, treatment of mark-to-market derivative additions, and allowability of depreciation or loss on investments are the subject matter noted in the text. It also records that the Revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petition was dismissed because a delay of 574 days was not satisfactorily explained, leaving the merits of the tax issues unadjudicated in this excerpt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 822 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788067</link>
      <description>Section 43B deduction for contributions to an approved pension fund, treatment of mark-to-market derivative additions, and allowability of depreciation or loss on investments are the subject matter noted in the text. It also records that the Revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petition was dismissed because a delay of 574 days was not satisfactorily explained, leaving the merits of the tax issues unadjudicated in this excerpt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>