<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 823 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788068</link>
    <description>Reasons for reopening under section 147 based on alleged discrepancies in financial statements, excess investment, interest on borrowings, utilisation of securities premium and Rule 8D adjustments were treated as reflecting scrutiny of records and a change of opinion rather than any failure to truly and fully disclose material facts necessary for assessment. The text also notes that the Special Leave Petition was dismissed for inordinate delay of 498 days because the explanation offered did not constitute sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 823 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788068</link>
      <description>Reasons for reopening under section 147 based on alleged discrepancies in financial statements, excess investment, interest on borrowings, utilisation of securities premium and Rule 8D adjustments were treated as reflecting scrutiny of records and a change of opinion rather than any failure to truly and fully disclose material facts necessary for assessment. The text also notes that the Special Leave Petition was dismissed for inordinate delay of 498 days because the explanation offered did not constitute sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>