<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 95 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50589</link>
    <description>Under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, a solitary arm&#039;s length sale to an outside buyer can furnish the normal price for valuing captively consumed goods; multiple sales are not required, and the sale price may be adopted for captive-clearance valuation. However, where the record indicates possible differences in variety or quality between the sold goods and the captively used goods, the comparable sale price must be verified on a variety-wise basis before application. The valuation was therefore upheld in principle, but remitted for factual verification and fresh computation under the correct rule-based method if comparability was not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 95 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50589</link>
      <description>Under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, a solitary arm&#039;s length sale to an outside buyer can furnish the normal price for valuing captively consumed goods; multiple sales are not required, and the sale price may be adopted for captive-clearance valuation. However, where the record indicates possible differences in variety or quality between the sold goods and the captively used goods, the comparable sale price must be verified on a variety-wise basis before application. The valuation was therefore upheld in principle, but remitted for factual verification and fresh computation under the correct rule-based method if comparability was not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>