<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 835 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788080</link>
    <description>Writ petitions seeking pre-emptive quashing of a show cause notice proposing cancellation of GST registration are not maintainable; the article applies the settled principle that such challenges must be pursued within the statutory adjudicatory process rather than by anticipatory writ relief, and notes dismissal of the petition on that ground. The operative legal point is that where the statutory scheme provides an adjudicatory remedy, writ jurisdiction ordinarily should not be invoked to pre-empt or stay the statutory proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 835 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788080</link>
      <description>Writ petitions seeking pre-emptive quashing of a show cause notice proposing cancellation of GST registration are not maintainable; the article applies the settled principle that such challenges must be pursued within the statutory adjudicatory process rather than by anticipatory writ relief, and notes dismissal of the petition on that ground. The operative legal point is that where the statutory scheme provides an adjudicatory remedy, writ jurisdiction ordinarily should not be invoked to pre-empt or stay the statutory proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>