<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 731 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787976</link>
    <description>Comparable selection under TNMM must be tested on functional similarity and commercially relevant comparability factors; excluded comparables found functionally similar were directed to be included, while objections to one TPO-selected comparable were remanded for limited verification of related-party transactions and outsourcing expenses. A guarantee commission adjustment was not sustained where the arrangement was back-to-back, the assessee performed only a limited execution role, and it did not bear the underlying credit or performance risk. Disallowance of payments to VISA and MasterCard was deleted because withholding tax liability had to be determined under the law prevailing at the time of payment. A corresponding reduction was allowed to prevent double taxation of income already taxed in an earlier year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 731 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787976</link>
      <description>Comparable selection under TNMM must be tested on functional similarity and commercially relevant comparability factors; excluded comparables found functionally similar were directed to be included, while objections to one TPO-selected comparable were remanded for limited verification of related-party transactions and outsourcing expenses. A guarantee commission adjustment was not sustained where the arrangement was back-to-back, the assessee performed only a limited execution role, and it did not bear the underlying credit or performance risk. Disallowance of payments to VISA and MasterCard was deleted because withholding tax liability had to be determined under the law prevailing at the time of payment. A corresponding reduction was allowed to prevent double taxation of income already taxed in an earlier year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>