<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1989 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467339</link>
    <description>Challenge to the assessing officer&#039;s jurisdiction to issue a notice under the reassessment provision was rejected where the Section 148A(b) record contained specific transactional material and a recorded prima facie opinion; the court upheld prior dismissal. The court found bank transaction data demonstrating withdrawals that met the statutory asset-threshold for reassessment, so assumption of jurisdiction on that ground stood. The contention of a proposed roving enquiry failed because a prima facie basis was recorded and the assessee was given an opportunity to produce evidence. The review petition was dismissed, leaving the original adjudication intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 18:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1989 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467339</link>
      <description>Challenge to the assessing officer&#039;s jurisdiction to issue a notice under the reassessment provision was rejected where the Section 148A(b) record contained specific transactional material and a recorded prima facie opinion; the court upheld prior dismissal. The court found bank transaction data demonstrating withdrawals that met the statutory asset-threshold for reassessment, so assumption of jurisdiction on that ground stood. The contention of a proposed roving enquiry failed because a prima facie basis was recorded and the assessee was given an opportunity to produce evidence. The review petition was dismissed, leaving the original adjudication intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>