https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467342 High Court refused to exercise writ jurisdiction to interfere with a detailed income tax assessment where contested factual questions and evidentiary disputes remained and an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; the court limited judicial review when factual determinations underpin the assessment and directed the petitioner to pursue the available appeal. The court also held that reliance on a related HUF's return and invoices alleged to be in a proprietor's name raised factual and evidentiary issues unsuitable for writ adjudication, leaving those matters to the appellate authority to decide on merits. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:16:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467342 High Court refused to exercise writ jurisdiction to interfere with a detailed income tax assessment where contested factual questions and evidentiary disputes remained and an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; the court limited judicial review when factual determinations underpin the assessment and directed the petitioner to pursue the available appeal. The court also held that reliance on a related HUF's return and invoices alleged to be in a proprietor's name raised factual and evidentiary issues unsuitable for writ adjudication, leaving those matters to the appellate authority to decide on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467342