<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 676 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787921</link>
    <description>Deeming provision substituting declared consideration with stamp duty value is inapplicable where the stamp authority has revised the valuation for a fundamental factual error, and the revised lower valuation negates reliance on the original figure - deletion of the 50C addition follows. For under construction purchases, qualifying reinvestment is determined by substantive completion, staged payments and receipt of possession within the statutory period rather than the initial booking date, and the new under construction asset is excluded when applying the ownership proviso - exemption under 54F allowed. Penalty based solely on deleted additions and on interpretational controversy with full disclosure is deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 676 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787921</link>
      <description>Deeming provision substituting declared consideration with stamp duty value is inapplicable where the stamp authority has revised the valuation for a fundamental factual error, and the revised lower valuation negates reliance on the original figure - deletion of the 50C addition follows. For under construction purchases, qualifying reinvestment is determined by substantive completion, staged payments and receipt of possession within the statutory period rather than the initial booking date, and the new under construction asset is excluded when applying the ownership proviso - exemption under 54F allowed. Penalty based solely on deleted additions and on interpretational controversy with full disclosure is deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>