<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 709 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787954</link>
    <description>Unexplained credits treated as share capital and premium require proof of three cumulative ingredients - investor identity, investor capacity/creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction - and documentary compliance alone is not conclusive; independent enquiries (bank tracing, field verification, surveys, statements) may be used to test the &quot;source of the source&quot; and lift the corporate veil. The tribunal erred in relying primarily on formal documents without addressing incriminating material showing routing and return of funds, non existent or name lender investors and meagre financials; accordingly the addition under Section 68 read with Sections 153A and 143(3) is restored in favour of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 709 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787954</link>
      <description>Unexplained credits treated as share capital and premium require proof of three cumulative ingredients - investor identity, investor capacity/creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction - and documentary compliance alone is not conclusive; independent enquiries (bank tracing, field verification, surveys, statements) may be used to test the &quot;source of the source&quot; and lift the corporate veil. The tribunal erred in relying primarily on formal documents without addressing incriminating material showing routing and return of funds, non existent or name lender investors and meagre financials; accordingly the addition under Section 68 read with Sections 153A and 143(3) is restored in favour of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>