<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 713 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787958</link>
    <description>A certified hypothecation statement specifying quantities and values may be treated as reliable evidence for tax assessment where it records true stock position and conforms with permanent books, and substantial unexplained discrepancies permit taxable additions; deliberately inflated declarations to obtain bank credit constitute commercial immorality and justify corrective additions. Where the tribunal&#039;s findings rest on that certified statement and comparison with books, absence of material demonstrating perversity or lack of evidence precludes interference, and appellate challenge to such additions will fail - impugned orders upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 713 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787958</link>
      <description>A certified hypothecation statement specifying quantities and values may be treated as reliable evidence for tax assessment where it records true stock position and conforms with permanent books, and substantial unexplained discrepancies permit taxable additions; deliberately inflated declarations to obtain bank credit constitute commercial immorality and justify corrective additions. Where the tribunal&#039;s findings rest on that certified statement and comparison with books, absence of material demonstrating perversity or lack of evidence precludes interference, and appellate challenge to such additions will fail - impugned orders upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>