<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 722 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787967</link>
    <description>Where delayed filing of GST annual returns attracts late fee under Section 47(2), an additional general penalty under Section 125 for the same default is not warranted absent an independent basis for further penalty. The general penalty was therefore set aside, while the late fee was maintained as payable. Ancillary relief followed on compliance, and the bank attachment was to be lifted once the confirmed late fee was paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 722 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787967</link>
      <description>Where delayed filing of GST annual returns attracts late fee under Section 47(2), an additional general penalty under Section 125 for the same default is not warranted absent an independent basis for further penalty. The general penalty was therefore set aside, while the late fee was maintained as payable. Ancillary relief followed on compliance, and the bank attachment was to be lifted once the confirmed late fee was paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>