<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proceeds of Crime: bona fide share sale returns not proceeds in seller&#039;s hands; mining profits remain attachable after cost deductions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97693</link>
    <description>The text addresses provisional attachment of alleged proceeds of crime: sale proceeds from shares purchased by the appellant and later sold to a bona fide third party do not constitute proceeds of crime in the appellant&#039;s hands because the purchase was an outgo and consideration paid was not shown to be derived from criminal activity; returns to the innocent purchaser are bona fide. Profits from limestone extraction were treated as the &#039;value&#039; of proceeds of crime on the material before the authority, but quantification was reduced after deducting verifiable extraction costs. The recorded investigative grounds met the &#039;reason to believe&#039; threshold for Section 5 attachment. The tribunal cannot order statutory substitution of attached property, though the enforcement agency may accept alternate security.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proceeds of Crime: bona fide share sale returns not proceeds in seller&#039;s hands; mining profits remain attachable after cost deductions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97693</link>
      <description>The text addresses provisional attachment of alleged proceeds of crime: sale proceeds from shares purchased by the appellant and later sold to a bona fide third party do not constitute proceeds of crime in the appellant&#039;s hands because the purchase was an outgo and consideration paid was not shown to be derived from criminal activity; returns to the innocent purchaser are bona fide. Profits from limestone extraction were treated as the &#039;value&#039; of proceeds of crime on the material before the authority, but quantification was reduced after deducting verifiable extraction costs. The recorded investigative grounds met the &#039;reason to believe&#039; threshold for Section 5 attachment. The tribunal cannot order statutory substitution of attached property, though the enforcement agency may accept alternate security.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>