<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Purchases Evidence: invoices, bank payments and GST records prevent total disallowance under section 37.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97690</link>
    <description>Disallowance of purchases under section 37 was challenged where the assessee produced invoices, bank statements showing payments through banking channels, supplier confirmations and GST returns; the Tribunal held that production of these documents discharged the assessee&#039;s primary onus and, absent affirmative contrary material from the revenue proving suppliers non-existent or payments returned as cashback, the AO/first appellate authority could not draw an adverse inference to disallow entire purchases. Reliance on precedent supporting that complete disallowance is impermissible when supporting documents are furnished; disallowance deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Purchases Evidence: invoices, bank payments and GST records prevent total disallowance under section 37.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97690</link>
      <description>Disallowance of purchases under section 37 was challenged where the assessee produced invoices, bank statements showing payments through banking channels, supplier confirmations and GST returns; the Tribunal held that production of these documents discharged the assessee&#039;s primary onus and, absent affirmative contrary material from the revenue proving suppliers non-existent or payments returned as cashback, the AO/first appellate authority could not draw an adverse inference to disallow entire purchases. Reliance on precedent supporting that complete disallowance is impermissible when supporting documents are furnished; disallowance deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>