<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty discretion under statutory maximum upheld; appellate enhancement refused where adjudicator gave a reasoned, reduced quantum.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97671</link>
    <description>Adjudicatory discretion to fix penalty under Section 13(1) of FEMA permits assessment up to a statutory maximum but does not mandate a minimum; therefore the adjudicator may impose a reduced, reasoned penalty. The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s objectively reasoned exercise of discretion, noting the imposed penalty was substantially below the statutory cap and that practical factors - including the respondents&#039; inability to comply with pre-deposit directions and non realisation of penalty - made appellate enhancement unwarranted. Consequently the appeal for enhancement was dismissed and the existing quantum left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty discretion under statutory maximum upheld; appellate enhancement refused where adjudicator gave a reasoned, reduced quantum.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97671</link>
      <description>Adjudicatory discretion to fix penalty under Section 13(1) of FEMA permits assessment up to a statutory maximum but does not mandate a minimum; therefore the adjudicator may impose a reduced, reasoned penalty. The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s objectively reasoned exercise of discretion, noting the imposed penalty was substantially below the statutory cap and that practical factors - including the respondents&#039; inability to comply with pre-deposit directions and non realisation of penalty - made appellate enhancement unwarranted. Consequently the appeal for enhancement was dismissed and the existing quantum left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>