<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1434 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467313</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed service tax remittance was found unsustainable where the tax was paid after receipt of consideration from the client and one portion had already been paid before the show cause notice. The liability arose because service tax had not been charged initially and payment depended on client disbursement, while the exemption circular applicable to CISF security services was also considered. On these facts, the delay in remittance was not treated as justifying confirmation of interest, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1434 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467313</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed service tax remittance was found unsustainable where the tax was paid after receipt of consideration from the client and one portion had already been paid before the show cause notice. The liability arose because service tax had not been charged initially and payment depended on client disbursement, while the exemption circular applicable to CISF security services was also considered. On these facts, the delay in remittance was not treated as justifying confirmation of interest, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>