<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1311 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467290</link>
    <description>In an appeal against acquittal, reversal is permissible only where the trial court&#039;s view is palpably wrong or unsustainable; here, the High Court failed to record that required satisfaction, so the acquittal was restored. Extra-judicial confession must be voluntary, credible, and trustworthy, but the alleged confession was delayed and made before a witness with no convincing basis for disclosure, so it could not support conviction. Discovery evidence under Section 27 must prove the precise information given by the accused and the fact discovered, but the recoveries and panchnamas were not legally reliable. Motive and circumstantial evidence also failed to form a complete chain excluding innocence, so the conviction was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1311 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467290</link>
      <description>In an appeal against acquittal, reversal is permissible only where the trial court&#039;s view is palpably wrong or unsustainable; here, the High Court failed to record that required satisfaction, so the acquittal was restored. Extra-judicial confession must be voluntary, credible, and trustworthy, but the alleged confession was delayed and made before a witness with no convincing basis for disclosure, so it could not support conviction. Discovery evidence under Section 27 must prove the precise information given by the accused and the fact discovered, but the recoveries and panchnamas were not legally reliable. Motive and circumstantial evidence also failed to form a complete chain excluding innocence, so the conviction was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>