<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1715 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467291</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that an employee-facing adverse action based on citizenship verification and service termination must comply with natural justice. It found that the claimant had established a sufficient basis for his Indian citizenship claim on the materials before the authority, and that the termination was unsustainable because the show cause notice and order did not disclose reasons or supply the relied-upon verification material. The Court further held that unexplained delay in police verification could not justify denial of consequential service and pensionary benefits, especially after long service. The High Court&#039;s interference was set aside and the employee was found entitled to the benefits payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1715 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467291</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that an employee-facing adverse action based on citizenship verification and service termination must comply with natural justice. It found that the claimant had established a sufficient basis for his Indian citizenship claim on the materials before the authority, and that the termination was unsustainable because the show cause notice and order did not disclose reasons or supply the relied-upon verification material. The Court further held that unexplained delay in police verification could not justify denial of consequential service and pensionary benefits, especially after long service. The High Court&#039;s interference was set aside and the employee was found entitled to the benefits payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>