<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1715 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467291</link>
    <description>The appeal addressed (i) burden of proof on a claimant under statutory scheme to establish Indian citizenship and the need for adjudication by the competent authority-court recognised the claimant&#039;s materials as sufficient to require consideration while leaving the legal burden on the claimant; (ii) breach of natural justice in a termination where reasons were not recorded and the verification report was not furnished-court applied principles requiring reasoned administrative action and a meaningful personal hearing and invalidated the termination; and (iii) undue delay in post appointment police verification prejudicing pensionary/service rights-court held delayed verification and termination unsustainable and ordered unpaid service benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1715 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467291</link>
      <description>The appeal addressed (i) burden of proof on a claimant under statutory scheme to establish Indian citizenship and the need for adjudication by the competent authority-court recognised the claimant&#039;s materials as sufficient to require consideration while leaving the legal burden on the claimant; (ii) breach of natural justice in a termination where reasons were not recorded and the verification report was not furnished-court applied principles requiring reasoned administrative action and a meaningful personal hearing and invalidated the termination; and (iii) undue delay in post appointment police verification prejudicing pensionary/service rights-court held delayed verification and termination unsustainable and ordered unpaid service benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>