<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1617 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467292</link>
    <description>Whether additions under Section 68 were sustainable turned on the assessee&#039;s discharge of the initial onus to prove (i) identity of investor, (ii) creditworthiness, and (iii) genuineness of transactions. Tribunal found the assessee produced income-tax returns, audited accounts, bank statements, share certificates, evidence of tax compliance under a dispute-settlement scheme, records of interest payments and TDS, and that amounts were received as interest-bearing unsecured loans later converted to equity. The assessing officer relied on survey statements without adequate recorded reasons to reject documentary evidence; additions were deleted and appeals allowed in favour of the assessee by ITAT RAIPUR - AT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1617 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467292</link>
      <description>Whether additions under Section 68 were sustainable turned on the assessee&#039;s discharge of the initial onus to prove (i) identity of investor, (ii) creditworthiness, and (iii) genuineness of transactions. Tribunal found the assessee produced income-tax returns, audited accounts, bank statements, share certificates, evidence of tax compliance under a dispute-settlement scheme, records of interest payments and TDS, and that amounts were received as interest-bearing unsecured loans later converted to equity. The assessing officer relied on survey statements without adequate recorded reasons to reject documentary evidence; additions were deleted and appeals allowed in favour of the assessee by ITAT RAIPUR - AT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>