<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1631 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467298</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment under section 148/147 was invalidated for lack of concrete material establishing the requisite reasons to believe; the reassessment record contained unsupported assertions, withheld source information, and no evidence of manipulation or conspiracy, so additions under section 69C read with section 115BBE rested on conjecture and were set aside, resulting in the reassessment and consequential additions being struck down in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1631 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467298</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment under section 148/147 was invalidated for lack of concrete material establishing the requisite reasons to believe; the reassessment record contained unsupported assertions, withheld source information, and no evidence of manipulation or conspiracy, so additions under section 69C read with section 115BBE rested on conjecture and were set aside, resulting in the reassessment and consequential additions being struck down in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>