<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 1052 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467289</link>
    <description>Rate-of-duty determinations are appealable to the Supreme Court rather than the High Court. Where an appeal challenges a decision on the rate of duty, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it because the statutory appellate route lies directly to the Supreme Court. The maintainability objection therefore succeeds, and the appeal is rejected for want of the proper appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 1052 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467289</link>
      <description>Rate-of-duty determinations are appealable to the Supreme Court rather than the High Court. Where an appeal challenges a decision on the rate of duty, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it because the statutory appellate route lies directly to the Supreme Court. The maintainability objection therefore succeeds, and the appeal is rejected for want of the proper appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>