<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 617 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467285</link>
    <description>The principal issue was whether a long standing method of closing stock valuation, repeatedly adopted by the assessee and accepted by the Department, could be disturbed for a specific assessment year. The court declined to adjudicate the scientific correctness of the method but applied judicial discretion on factual and pragmatic grounds: prolonged acceptance, practical impossibility of rewriting multiple years&#039; opening stock, and an undertaking by the assessee to discontinue the method prospectively. Applying these considerations, the HC set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:29:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 617 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467285</link>
      <description>The principal issue was whether a long standing method of closing stock valuation, repeatedly adopted by the assessee and accepted by the Department, could be disturbed for a specific assessment year. The court declined to adjudicate the scientific correctness of the method but applied judicial discretion on factual and pragmatic grounds: prolonged acceptance, practical impossibility of rewriting multiple years&#039; opening stock, and an undertaking by the assessee to discontinue the method prospectively. Applying these considerations, the HC set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>