<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 597 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787842</link>
    <description>The document addresses entitlement to regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act focusing on the mandatory twin conditions for bail and the statutory presumption regarding proceeds of crime. It explains that the accused bears the burden to rebut the presumption that seized property constitutes proceeds of crime and that the court must be satisfied on reasonable grounds the accused is not guilty and will not interfere with justice. The material relied on-seizure of official registers, alleged tampering of revenue records, recovered communications and surveys-was held to be prima facie incriminating, and the bail application was refused for failure to meet statutory conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:36:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 597 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787842</link>
      <description>The document addresses entitlement to regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act focusing on the mandatory twin conditions for bail and the statutory presumption regarding proceeds of crime. It explains that the accused bears the burden to rebut the presumption that seized property constitutes proceeds of crime and that the court must be satisfied on reasonable grounds the accused is not guilty and will not interfere with justice. The material relied on-seizure of official registers, alleged tampering of revenue records, recovered communications and surveys-was held to be prima facie incriminating, and the bail application was refused for failure to meet statutory conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>