<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 645 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787890</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was granted where the accused had cooperated with investigation, appeared before the Investigating Officer, and co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. The Court treated the alleged forged-document dispute as a matter for trial and declined to express any view on merits to avoid prejudice. On those facts, the appellant was held entitled to anticipatory bail, subject to terms and conditions imposed by the Investigating Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 645 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787890</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was granted where the accused had cooperated with investigation, appeared before the Investigating Officer, and co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. The Court treated the alleged forged-document dispute as a matter for trial and declined to express any view on merits to avoid prejudice. On those facts, the appellant was held entitled to anticipatory bail, subject to terms and conditions imposed by the Investigating Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>