<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transaction value rejection: reassessment using contemporaneous import prices invalid where reasons and hearing were not disclosed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97649</link>
    <description>Rejection of declared transaction value was challenged on the ground that reassessment relied on contemporaneous import prices without adequate disclosure or opportunity to the importer; CESTAT held that Rule 12 requires written intimation of grounds and a reasonable hearing before discarding transaction value. The authority&#039;s use of NIDB contemporaneous prices was not transparently explained as comparable to the imported goods and was not made available pre-hearing, depriving the importer of a chance to rebut. Result: reassessment set aside for failure to give cogent reasons and opportunity consistent with the Valuation Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:36:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transaction value rejection: reassessment using contemporaneous import prices invalid where reasons and hearing were not disclosed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97649</link>
      <description>Rejection of declared transaction value was challenged on the ground that reassessment relied on contemporaneous import prices without adequate disclosure or opportunity to the importer; CESTAT held that Rule 12 requires written intimation of grounds and a reasonable hearing before discarding transaction value. The authority&#039;s use of NIDB contemporaneous prices was not transparently explained as comparable to the imported goods and was not made available pre-hearing, depriving the importer of a chance to rebut. Result: reassessment set aside for failure to give cogent reasons and opportunity consistent with the Valuation Rules.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 08:36:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>