<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Kerala HC disqualifies Vellappally Natesan, other office bearers and Board of SNDP Yogam</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=71525</link>
    <description>The court ruled that non filing of financial statements and annual returns for consecutive years triggered statutory disqualification under the Companies Act and barred reappointment, and that absence of valid Director Identification Numbers constituted an independent disqualification. It quashed the prior administrative finding that excused disqualification for certain years, directed the state to facilitate appointment of directors and immediate elections, and instructed the Inspector General of Registration to take action including statutory penalties; the court held that an amnesty scheme did not remove disqualification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 21:01:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 21:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Kerala HC disqualifies Vellappally Natesan, other office bearers and Board of SNDP Yogam</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=71525</link>
      <description>The court ruled that non filing of financial statements and annual returns for consecutive years triggered statutory disqualification under the Companies Act and barred reappointment, and that absence of valid Director Identification Numbers constituted an independent disqualification. It quashed the prior administrative finding that excused disqualification for certain years, directed the state to facilitate appointment of directors and immediate elections, and instructed the Inspector General of Registration to take action including statutory penalties; the court held that an amnesty scheme did not remove disqualification.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 21:01:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=71525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>