<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2178 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467262</link>
    <description>Interest on non-performing assets was not taxable on accrual basis where recovery remained uncertain and the co-operative bank, following binding RBI directions, consistently recognised such interest only on receipt; the addition was therefore unsustainable. A provision for standard assets was also held allowable for eligible banks, because the statutory deduction for provisions for bad and doubtful debts was not confined only to provisions linked to bad assets; the disallowance was deleted and the claim sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2178 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467262</link>
      <description>Interest on non-performing assets was not taxable on accrual basis where recovery remained uncertain and the co-operative bank, following binding RBI directions, consistently recognised such interest only on receipt; the addition was therefore unsustainable. A provision for standard assets was also held allowable for eligible banks, because the statutory deduction for provisions for bad and doubtful debts was not confined only to provisions linked to bad assets; the disallowance was deleted and the claim sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>