<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1804 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467272</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment beyond four years and objections under section 147 are to be dealt with in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The Revenue&#039;s SLP was disposed of as covered by that judgment, and assessing officers were directed to decide objections consistently with the law laid down there. The assessee was left free to pursue available remedies, except on matters already concluded by that judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:16:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1804 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467272</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment beyond four years and objections under section 147 are to be dealt with in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The Revenue&#039;s SLP was disposed of as covered by that judgment, and assessing officers were directed to decide objections consistently with the law laid down there. The assessee was left free to pursue available remedies, except on matters already concluded by that judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>