<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 506 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787751</link>
    <description>Retention of 15% from port dues under a concessionaire arrangement was treated as a book adjustment from a statutory fund earmarked for maintenance and overheads, not as an independent consideration paid by the Government. Because the port dues had already suffered service tax and the appellant was engaged to maintain the port rather than act as a commission agent for the Government, the same receipt could not be taxed again as Business Auxiliary Service or Port Services. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 506 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787751</link>
      <description>Retention of 15% from port dues under a concessionaire arrangement was treated as a book adjustment from a statutory fund earmarked for maintenance and overheads, not as an independent consideration paid by the Government. Because the port dues had already suffered service tax and the appellant was engaged to maintain the port rather than act as a commission agent for the Government, the same receipt could not be taxed again as Business Auxiliary Service or Port Services. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>