https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787757 Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was not shown to be vitiated by manifest illegality or non-compliance with statutory safeguards, as the record reflected recorded statements, search and seizure, communication of grounds of arrest, and production before the designated court. Prima facie material, including unaccounted cash, jewellery, digital material, and section 50 statements, was sufficient at the investigation stage to support involvement with proceeds of crime. The challenges based on earlier FIR arraignment, absence of quantification at arrest, and cooperation with investigation did not establish patent illegality, so the remand orders were upheld and writ interference was declined. en-us Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787757 Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was not shown to be vitiated by manifest illegality or non-compliance with statutory safeguards, as the record reflected recorded statements, search and seizure, communication of grounds of arrest, and production before the designated court. Prima facie material, including unaccounted cash, jewellery, digital material, and section 50 statements, was sufficient at the investigation stage to support involvement with proceeds of crime. The challenges based on earlier FIR arraignment, absence of quantification at arrest, and cooperation with investigation did not establish patent illegality, so the remand orders were upheld and writ interference was declined. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787757