<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 542 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787787</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay: the tribunal applied a liberal standard where notices sent to an incorrect email address caused non-receipt, found sufficient cause and condoned a 488 day delay, admitting the appeal. Characterisation of expenditure: renovations, flooring, repairs and electrical works that rehabilitated and preserved existing temple structures without creating a new enduring asset were treated as revenue expenditure; the tribunal deleted the assessing officer&#039;s disallowance and directed allowance of the full claimed expenditure. The outcomes rest on the absence of asset creation, documentary evidence of works, and the need to secure substantial justice by condoning procedural delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 542 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787787</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay: the tribunal applied a liberal standard where notices sent to an incorrect email address caused non-receipt, found sufficient cause and condoned a 488 day delay, admitting the appeal. Characterisation of expenditure: renovations, flooring, repairs and electrical works that rehabilitated and preserved existing temple structures without creating a new enduring asset were treated as revenue expenditure; the tribunal deleted the assessing officer&#039;s disallowance and directed allowance of the full claimed expenditure. The outcomes rest on the absence of asset creation, documentary evidence of works, and the need to secure substantial justice by condoning procedural delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>